It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics
question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known
physics were established.
Hal Ruhl wrote:
At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
"nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is
intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes
relative comparisons.
Danny Mayes
Actually no. The meaningful question that the Nothing must resolve is
its own stability - persistence. This is the case in both models. It
is a freshman physics question. The Nothing must resolve it but can
not. This causes the decay into a Something if you will in both
models. In the model free of an "All" once this happens it continues
to complete itself by some path. This is a creation of information
scenario. Choice is the way to do this.
Hal
--
Danny Mayes
Law Office of W. Daniel Mayes
130 Waterloo St., SW
P.O. Drawer 2650
Aiken, SC 29802
(803) 648-6642
(803) 648-4049 fax
877-528-5598 toll free
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
