Bruno, John, list, Bruno wrote:
...I don't exclude at all I could change my mind about that title, either for diplomatic reasons and/or for "scientific" reasons (in case Ben succeed for example in explaining that G* has nothing to do with theology (even comp theologies), which I doubt. That bar is set too high, I think. I've certainly never claimed that G* has nothing to do with theology. Like with any two things, in order to be called "theology," G* needs more than a significant relation with theology. Best, Ben Udell
