On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 2:39:57 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:



All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 09:30, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :



On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 11:52:42 PM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:

AG,

No, I’m not asserting that the universe is spatially finite. The standard 
ΛCDM model allows for an infinite spatial extent while still experiencing 
expansion. The observable universe is finite due to the speed of light and 
the age of the universe, but beyond that, space could extend infinitely 
while still expanding. Expansion refers to the metric stretching of space, 
not necessarily implying a finite boundary. Already discussed.

Some photons emitted in the unobservable region will never reach us because 
their source galaxies are receding too fast, while others might enter our 
observable universe if the Hubble rate decreases sufficiently over time. 
The key factor is that the expansion rate evolves, altering the fate of 
emitted light.

Quentin 

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 05:36, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :



On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 10:30:41 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:

Yes, I’m assuming spatial expansion, not just increasing galactic 
distances. The observable horizon expands because the Hubble rate evolves 
over time. 


*So, are you now agreeing that the universe is spatially finite and 
expanding, as distinguished from the model that the universe is infinite in 
spatial extent while the average distance between galaxies in increasing? 
AG  *

While some distant galaxies are receding faster than light, the expansion 
rate is not constant, allowing light from previously unobservable regions 
to eventually reach us. This is why our observable universe continues to 
grow.


*So, for some photons emitted from a galaxy in the unobservable region, 
they never reach us since space in that region is expanding faster than 
light speed, but others (emitted from different galaxies in the 
unobservable region) will eventually reach us since the rate of expansion 
slows as time progresses, such that the spatial expansion in their region 
has slowed below light speed? AG *


As for black holes, when they eject material, it comes from the accretion 
disk, not the interior. Excess inflowing matter, under extreme magnetic 
fields and radiation pressure, is expelled before crossing the event 
horizon. Once inside, nothing escapes.


*That might not be true if all the mass/energy of the universe originated 
as a BH, which we can identify as the BB. Doesn't the ultra high 
temperature with all mass/energy concentrated nearly as a spatial 
singularity at this BB cause a BH to form? AG *


Already answered.


*Please copy and paste your answer.*


No, use your own fingers.


I forgot where that was posted. AG


* If the universe is infinite in spatial extent, and we run the clock 
backward, is all  the mass/energy of the observable region confined to a 
tiny or zero volume? What happens to the mass/energy of the unobservable 
region? TY, AG*


Did you answer the above question? AG 


Quentin


Quentin 

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

Le mar. 18 mars 2025, 16:54, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :



On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 5:03:42 PM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:

I have been reflecting on the idea that our universe could be the interior 
of a giant black hole, but several fundamental questions arise.

How can this account for the apparent flatness of the universe, given that 
a black hole’s interior should exhibit strong curvature? Observations 
indicate that our universe is nearly flat, yet this hypothesis lacks a 
clear mechanism to explain why.

If we are inside a black hole, where is the boundary? A black hole's 
internal space-time is inherently limited by the event horizon, yet our 
observable universe does not show any indication of such a constraint. How 
does this model reconcile the absence of an observable edge?

Furthermore, in classical black hole physics, the event horizon expands 
only when additional mass or energy is absorbed. In contrast, our 
universe’s observable horizon grows over time without any apparent external 
input. What mechanism would drive this expansion in a black hole framework?

These points suggest that such a model would require an unconventional and 
exotic space-time structure beyond classical general relativity. I would 
appreciate any insights on how these issues could be addressed.

Quentin 

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
Batty/Rutger Hauer)


When you refer to the horizon expanding of the observable universe, are you 
now assuming the universe is expanding spatially, rather than just the 
average galactic distances increasing? BTW, I'm confused about how that 
horizon increases spatially. Aren't the galaxies in the unobservable 
regions receding faster than light speed, and this is the reason they're 
unobservable for us? If so, how can the observable region increase so some 
of them become part of the observable region? One other thing; I viewed a 
video showing BH's releasing material when too much is inflowing. Is some 
of this material from the interior, or is all of it inflowing material that 
is rejected? AG 

-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].

To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0534ced9-b434-4ba0-8d54-070aa9241fbfn%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0534ced9-b434-4ba0-8d54-070aa9241fbfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1f59ad4b-eafd-42e1-95f3-1d1626005f20n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to