But then why limit it to computations? Why not assume everything,
computation or not? Then all possible computations will still be there,
emergent, but also other sequences we haven't even imagined. After all,
what is "allowed by the equations" depends on rules of inference that we
make up and there are alternative rules: ZF and ZFC for example or more
radically look at Graham Priest's dialetheism.
Brent
On 7/6/2025 2:26 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Yes, I am fully in the Bruno Marchal perspective, not the standard
MWI, and I’ve been clear about that for years. My recent essays only
restate what I’ve consistently said: reality as the totality of
computations, with physics as an emergent phenomenon. It is indeed a
form of neo-Platonism, but for me it’s the only framework that
coherently links physics and subjective experience.
Quentin
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le dim. 6 juil. 2025, 23:19, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> a
écrit :
Why limit it to the equations we've found to describe our world?
Why not go full Bruno Marchal? I'm just amazed that people invest
this kind of belief in metaphysics. It's just neo-Platonism.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4785647b-387f-4a8a-993e-6cf42761e830%40gmail.com.
