On Wednesday, September 17, 2025 at 5:31:39 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:11 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: *>For example, in a horse race with say 10 horses, it tells us that 10 worlds will be created, so each horse can win in some world. But that hardly scratches the surface. For any winner in any world, it tell us the huge number of worlds created for the losing positions of the losers. But that's not all. One way of winning for a winner is for every combination of the losers to have heart failure during the race, and in falling trips the other losers, so they don't make it to the finish line.It's all there in Schrodinger's equation. No doubt about it. AG* *Yes, there is no doubt about it, the multiverse is big.* *I've falsified your interpretation of S's equation as justifying your claim that every possible outcome MUST occur in some world. I suppose I'm using the same reasoning you use in denying SUPER DETERMINISM. Moreover, in your attempts to justify your claim about S's equation, you reference determinism, localism, and realism. What you conclude about these concepts might be true, but what it has to do with your claim that I am disputing, is nowhere in sight. AG* *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/543a55bb-5d6d-4f07-b6f2-8c7a163b1acbn%40googlegroups.com.
