David Nyman wrote:
> This isn't a surprise surely, because 'matter' is defined purely > relationally as behaviour. By whom ? >I just can't > see, except in 'as if' mode, how AR truly serves as 'ontic ground zero' > in this 'maximally serious' sense. Some of us think matter does... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
