Le 25-août-06, à 23:24, 1Z a écrit :
> AR as a claim about truth is implied by comoputationalism, and is > not enough to support the real (=as real as I am) existence > of the UD. It is you who come up with a notion of real existence. You are reifying I don't know which theory. > > AR as a claim about existence is > enough to support the real (=as real as I am) existence > of the UD, but is not impied by computationalism. And my WHOLE point is that it does not have to be that way. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
