Le 05-sept.-06, à 20:49, 1Z a écrit :
> That is the answer Stathis wants, but it doesn't work. Whether a > computation > is self-interpreting or not is itself a matter of interpretation, given > his premises. > He seems to need some sort of interpretation-independently > self-interpreting system > to start the ball rolling (= a Prime Mover). It is here that theoretical computer science provides a solution. It is hard to explain without digging more in the mathematical property of the Fi and Wi, etc. I am searching some ways to do that. It *is* counterituitive. Note that this is explained in the second part of the SANE papers, and in all details (albeit concisely) in the Elsevier paper. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
