Tom Caylor writes: >I'm talking about ultimate meaning, meaning which is ultimately based > >on truth. Purpose would go along with that. I think that this > >situation is similar (metaphysically isomorphic? :) to the "primary > >matter" situation. I think you maintain that experience is enough. I > >maintain that if all you have is relative references, you are having > >faith that there is ultimately something "there". I'm not interested > >in any straw-man caricature god who decides what is valuable etc. on a > >whim. I'm interested in the source of the wonderfully unexplainable > >good in us. >
If you built a model society and set its citizens instincts, goals, laws-from-heaven (but really from you) and so on, would that suffice to provide "meaning"? Stathis Papaioannou --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
