Jason, do you really consider YOUR (= ours, as of humans of today) capability of any 'ordering' - according to what WE find orderable - the ONLY possible 'ordering' that be? To include the word 'disorder' makes no difference. Noise? anything not fitting into what we can compute to fit into our order. Random? ditto. Chaos? what we cannot (today) assign to already discovered - YES - order. I give some credence to our ignorance (epistemically still undiscovered parts). We choose our 'models' to be studied/observed according to our knowledge of order.
John M ----- Original Message ----- From: Jason To: Everything List Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Statistical Measure, does it matter? > Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean by "the order of your current observer moment". > > > Stathis Papaioannou I see how my wording was confusing. What I meant by "order" was order vs. disorder, e.g. we are experiencing a well structured observer moment as opposed to white noise, even though the vast majority of conceivable observer moments would consist of white noise. A SSA would say we are not experiencing white noise/white rabbits because those OM's have a lower statistical measure. While not assuming an SSA, one could only explain our current experience on this planet as an infinitesmally small and rare occurance among the unlimited set of possible observer moments. Jason -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.13/725 - Release Date: 3/17/2007 12:33 PM --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
