Max skrev:
I have now read your new paper more carefully, and I have then found one error in it. I the top of page 6 you write:Hi Folks, After a decade of procrastination, I've finally finished writing up a sequel to that paper that I wrote back in 1996 (Is "the theory of everything'' merely the ultimate ensemble theory?) that's been the subject of so much interesting discussion in this group. It's entitled "The Mathematical Universe", and you'll find it at http://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.0646 and http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.html - I'd very much appreciate any comments that you may have. But there is a length scale "1" of special significance in our physical space, namely the Planck length:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theory" p... Max
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... Bruno Marchal
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... Torgny Tholerus
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... Bruno Marchal
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... Jayceetout
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... marc . geddes
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble t... marc . geddes
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... Torgny Tholerus
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble t... marc . geddes
- Re: A sequel to my 1996 "ultimate ensemble theor... William