On 13/07/07, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you are trying to give a name to what is unnameable (unless you > are not lobian; even lobian non-machine cannot name it).
Perish the thought. But I was referring to 'first person primacy', not 'the One'. Maybe something like the 'primacy of the unnameable'? On the other hand "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen" It doesn't seem to keep us quiet for long though :-) David > > > Le 13-juil.-07, à 17:02, David Nyman a écrit : > > > But since the One is not > > what most people would consider a person (let alone a god), another > > term would be better. I wonder what? > > > I think you are trying to give a name to what is unnameable (unless you > are not lobian; even lobian non-machine cannot name it). > > Bruno > > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
