On Aug 31, 9:40 pm, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Only a meta-theory *about* PA, can distinguish PA and arithmetical
> truth. But then Godel showed that sometimes a meta-theory can be
> translated in or by the theory/machine.
But is the meta-theory *about* PA, itself classified as either PA or
'Arithmetical truth' ? The meta-theory itself (when enacted as a
computation) cannot be classified as either, it seems to me. So it
appears there's a third category which is neither arithmetic
(descriptions) nor Arithemetic (platonic truth). And recognizing this
third category is the solution to the puzzle of reflection OK!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
