On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:48:58AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote: > So, I don't see any need for some kind of fundamental measure for > observer moments. Whenever we have a restriction defining a subclass > of observer moments that are of interest, we are naturally driven to > the RSSA and to a specific measure. If we have no restriction, then we > assign equal measure to all observer moments leading to the ASSA. I do > not see the categorical difference between the two concepts. Can you > make clear where the difference lies? > > Thank you > > Youness Ayaita >
The way I use the term, the ASSA just refers to use a global measure for answering the question "What is my next OM experienced". For other questions using a global measure over OMs, the original term SSSA (strong SSA) should be used. I'm aware of a few situations (mostly hypotheticals) where the SSSA is valid. The SSA refers to a global measure on birth moments, and the RSSA is typically based on the SSA. The everything list wiki has some notes on the RSSA/ASSA distinction - I'm wondering if these shouldn't be inserted directly into Wikipedia, as the everything wiki has been near death since its inception. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
