Hin 2008/11/7 Tom Caylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Anna, OK, I understand. > > Thomas, as another reference point for study, what I refer to as the > point of view from the Plenitude, or Plotinus' One, has frequently > been referred to as the "God's eye point of view". > (I didn't bring that up at first because I believe in a God who is > different from the Plenitude or Plotinus' One, both of which are > impersonal. By the way, the personal God is the only one in whom a > person can possibly believe, but that could be another topic.) > > Tom
Well... could you explain why a personal god is the *only one* a person can *possibly* believe ? because there is a little problem here... I do not believe in a personal god... yet I exist... so I'm possible... so believing in a personal god is not the only one a person can believe in... cqfd -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
