Hi Bruno, > I don't understand what you mean by computations being infinitely far > away. In the UD deployment, which I will wrote UD*, all computations > begins soon or later (like all dominoes falls soon or later in the > infinite discrete dominoe-sequences). All computations reach any of > their relative computational state soon or later always after the UD > makes a finite number of steps. snip > Hmmm... The phrasing "reconstitution at infinity" does not make sense, > I think. All reconstitutions are done after a finite number of steps > of the UD. But you are right that for (the third person description) > of the first person probable experience we have to take into account > the infinite union of the computations going through the relevant > state. The reals appears here and now, because they are generated at > the limit, as a infinite union of finite computations, or finite > pieces of infinite computations. snip > OK. But it is the union which is infinite. The reconstitution can be > numbered (by a God).
Yes, I see we agree - my fault. I meant the infinite union of computations - maybe "rec. at infinity" was a bit dramatic way of speaking - the way you put it is clearer. Cheers, Günther --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
