m.a. wrote: > *Bruno,* > * I've encountered some difficulty with the examples below. > You say that "in extension" describes exhaustion or > quasi-exhaustion. And you give the example: "**B = {3, 6, 9, 12, ... > 99}".* > * Then you define "in intension" with exactly the same type > of set: "Example: Let A be the set {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, ... 100}".*
No, that's not the intensional definition. This "We can easily define A in intension: A = the set of numbers which are even and more little than 100." is the intensional definition. Brent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---