It may be a useful summary of Special Relativity and General
Relativity for those who knows First Order Logic (FOL).
Is is W function computable? In that case comp refutes GR. His notion
of observer fulfills the (usual) Sigma_1 definition, and, like almost
everyone, he uses the identity thesis (of cognitive-science/philosophy-
of-mind) implicitly. Of course this remark is very general, it works
for such formal approach, but also on Tegmark's mathematicalist
approach, etc.
Bruno
On 07 May 2010, at 13:10, ronaldheld wrote:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.0960v1.pdf
Comments?
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
