On Apr 2, 9:41 pm, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 1:33 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 4/2/2012 10:02 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 2, 12:03 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net>  wrote:
> > >> On 4/2/2012 7:14 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > >>>>> If all movement was involuntary in the
> > >>>>>>   >    first place then there would be no significant difference 
> > >>>>>> between
> > >>>>>>   >    passively watching yourself move and passively watching 
> > >>>>>> yourself not
> > >>>>>>   >    move
> > >>>>>>   >    If we had no free will, our belief about it should have no 
> > >>>>>> effect on
> > >>>>>>   >    the actual ability to execute our wishes though our motor 
> > >>>>>> cortex.
> > >>>>>   Non sequitur.
> > >>> Why? If you program a machine to believe that it has free will, how
> > >>> would such a belief have any effect on its behavior? How could it
> > >>> improve its performance in any way?
> > >> If you program a machine to form explanatory and predictive models of 
> > >> the world, then it
> > >> will try to form a model of itself.  But it would be difficult and 
> > >> extremely wasteful,
> > >> from a survival standpoint, to provide it the introspective data 
> > >> necessary to model its
> > >> own physical internal decision processes.  Failing to have this 
> > >> introspection it may come
> > >> to foolishly believe in something it calls 'free will'.
>
> > > Why would there be an experience associated with any decision
> > > processes and how would that experience not be free will?
>
> > Most decisions do not have an experience associated with them, we make them
> > 'subconsciously' (e.g. the movement of my fingers in typing this).  So the 
> > experience of
> > free will is just the failure to be able to trace all the causes of a 
> > conscious decision.
> > Why are some decisions conscious, while most aren't...I'm not sure.  I 
> > think it has to do
> > with decisions for which we employee language/logic to predict consequences.
>
> > > If I have an experience of making decisions, then how would believing
> > > that experience is real or an illusion have the effect that we see on
> > > readiness?
>
> > > Readiness is measurable. Being influenced by the nonsense idea of
> > > illusory free will impacts performance negatively. If free will were
> > > truly an illusion, there could be no possibility of our belief in it
> > > (belief being something which is only meaningful if it pertains to
> > > contributing to making choices using free will) causing measurable
> > > changes in the supposedly deterministic functions of the brain.
>
> > Why not?  If the brain is deterministic then beliefs are deterministic and 
> > changing them
> > by external inputs can change performance.
>
> The belief is about the power to self determine though. The
> performance change is evidence that some change is possible.

Change is possible under determinism. In a sense.
> Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to