Hi Richard,
There are an infinite number of different monads, since
the world is filled with them and each is a
different perspective on the whole of the rest.
Not only that, but they keep changing, as
all life does.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/23/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 11:24:16
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
What exactly determines the 10^500 number?
On 8/22/2012 9:19 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads.
Scientist believe that each possible universe
contains but one kind of monad..
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
What is the landscape problem ?
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/22/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 21:26:58
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
?teinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC. ?rXiv:nucl-ex/09031471, 2009.
?ovtum PK, Son DT & Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum
Field Theories from Black Hole Physics. arXiv:hep-th/0405231.
? Good! Now to see if there any any other possible explanations that do not
have the landscape problem...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
Hi Richard,
? Could you link some sources on this?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist--?nstead, they represent things that
exist.
Anything in equation form is itself nonphysical, although the equations
might describe something physical.
The equations of string theory describe strings. So how does it follow that
strings aren't real. That's like saying a sentence that describes my house
shows that my house isn't real.
I agree that string theory (or any other theory) is a model of reality and not
reality itself. But, if it's correct, it refers to reality or at least some
part of reality - like, "My house is green." refers to a part of reality, but
"My house is blue." does not.
Brent
? When and if string theory makes a prediction that is then found to have a
physical demonstration we might be more confident that it is useful as a
physics theory and not just an exercise in beautiful advanced mathematics. The
LHC is looking for such evidence...
For example, if I live at 23 Main street, 23 Main Street is not my house,
it is my address.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/21/2012
--
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
