On 9/30/2012 4:31 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Hehe.
Fine.
However, the concrete abstract seems very promising for a theologian.
It is clear that Boudry know the concepts that he manage. His abstract
is a piece of cake, it is a "I solved the Teologian problem of our
time!" . It is not pure gibberish.
Remenber that the Sokal affair was around a complete article, not an
abstract.
Boudry also wrote a complete aritcle, which was published. You can follow the link and
read it, if you'r so inclined.
Brent
I know that a great number of hoax papers are submitted and
accepted in scientific press.Many of them are not for joking purposes,
but for people that want relevance, fame and money. This hasn´t to
undermine hard sciences. ( Not in the case of modern cultural and
gender studies that are pure indoctrination )
In my particular case, I worked in European I+D projects where
subsidies depended on the imagination, the length of the documents and
the appropriate use of buzzwords.
Alberto.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
