Bruno, Could you explain by example how comp could be verified.? That is does comp predict something that is not also predicted by science? What comes to my mind is consciousness. Richard
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: > > On 12 Apr 2013, at 02:47, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > No they don't. An epiphenomenon is an emergent effect. The natural > world is full of complexity and emergent phenomena. > > > Like arithmetic, from which nature emerge itself, necessarily so (and in a > verifiable way) if we assume that we have a level of digital substitution. > > I think you will not convince Craig, because he assumes from the start > mind and matter and some relation/identification between them, in a non > computational framework. But you are right, and patient, by showing him > that he is not valid when arguing that comp *has to* be wrong. > > Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
