On 28 Sep 2013, at 21:53, LizR wrote:
On 28 September 2013 21:15, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
On 28 Sep 2013, at 09:44, LizR wrote:
So not an ongoing computation performed by the universe,
What does that mean?
Actually I think I got confused, it isn't Max T who suggested that,
but didn't someone like John Conway suggest the universe could be
something like a game of life?
It is many people. It is called digital physics, and it is a priori
incompatible with both comp, and QM.
as suggested by, say, Max Tegmark?
Can you give a reference? Thanks,
Well for Max T it would be the mathematical universe hypothesis
paper but I imagine you know of that.
Yes. Actually, I told Tegmark (notably on this list), that the
mathematical universe hypothesis is too much fuzzy, and that comp
provides, thanks to Church thesis a precise mathematicalist thesis
(indeed arithmeticalist), which makes possible to explain the
emergence of consciousness and matter from the difference between the
povs, inheritated from incompleteness and its intensional (modal)
nuances. It seems to take this in consideration, except for the key FPI.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
