John,

All organisms, including babies, are conscious. Of course baby's minds do 
not compute the details of reality that well initially. But the results of 
those poor computations are nevertheless conscious...

The necessary distinction (elucidated by Chalmers and others as well as me) 
is between consciousness itself, and the contents of consciousness.

Edgar

On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:45:20 PM UTC-5, JohnM wrote:
>
> Edgar wrote:
>
> *Terren,*
> *All human babies are automatically consciousness. They are conscious of 
> whatever input data they have. I don't see the point of your question which 
> is why I didn't answer before...*
> *Edgar*
>
>  I would risk the typo: *consciousless* instead of *your* (grammatical) 
> typo . Do you know the way a newborn 'adjusts' *input data* in its 
> starting intellect? Prof. Singer of Princeton does not trust babies minds 
> during the first 2 months of after-birth life. I don't remember, was never 
> so young. 
> In my agnosticism I compose much more into that very poorly identified 
> (and really not  AGREED-UPON) term of *Ccness* why I extended its meaning 
> beyond 'being conscious'. E.g.: while being "unconscious" (aka: cut out 
> consciousness??) -  while sleeping, you still react to an alarm clock, or a 
> glass of cold water in your face.  So I was looking for a wider territory 
> meaning and arrived at the *'response to relations'* - (no matter what 
> domain in the world-wide existence (reality???). - Awareness etc. included.
>
> Now: do not take it hard from me, if I filter your 'book' (ideas, 
> explanations?) through my many-decades long conclusions (most learned 7 
> decades+ ago and do not just believe what YOU write. Most list-members are 
> not ignorant novices, many have firm opinions of things you re-define and 
> this is a natural source of disbelief. 
> Your "In my book" is no argument. We wrote books as well. . 
>
> *I "know" for sure that we don't know anything for sure.* I will not hunt 
> after such items and when I post disbelief that is something I usually can 
> support from my past  experience. 
>
> Have a good 2014 and beyond
>
> John Mikes
>
>  
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Terren,
>>
>> All human babies are automatically consciousness. They are conscious of 
>> whatever input data they have. I don't see the point of your question which 
>> is why I didn't answer before...
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:42:24 PM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote:
>>
>>> On the contrary, I replied with a question that went unanswered. 
>>>
>>> It was a question about whether a human baby, fed a stream of virtual 
>>> sense data as in the movie The Matrix, could be considered conscious in 
>>> your theory, as you seemed to suggest that consciousness was a property of 
>>> reality, as a function somehow of "ontological energy".
>>>
>>> Terren
>>> On Jan 8, 2014 1:49 PM, "Edgar L. Owen" <edga...@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Telmo,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the link but see my new topic "A theory of consciousness" of 
>>>> a few days ago which no one has even commented on and which is much more 
>>>> reasonable and explanatory.
>>>>
>>>> Edgar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 12:57:37 PM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In case you haven't seen it... 
>>>>>
>>>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219 
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like an attempt to recover materialism, which strikes me as 
>>>>> somewhat unexpected from Tegmark. Am I missing something? 
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, 
>>>>> Telmo. 
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to