On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:31:16PM -0800, meekerdb wrote: > > So what do you make of Nash's theorem which says every finite game > has an equilibrium in a *mixed* strategy? > > Brent >
What's the relevance? The corollory, I suppose, is that not every game with rational players (ie pure strategy players) has a Nash equilibrium. So what? Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
