On 19 Mar 2014, at 01:57, meekerdb wrote:

On 3/18/2014 5:07 PM, LizR wrote:
On 19 March 2014 12:47, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
But in general that would mean knowing the state of everything the system had interacted with in the past, since it is now entangled with them. So even if you suppose there is no collapse of the wavefunction, decoherence has the same effect.

I was only asking about the theoretical possibility, given unrealistically perfect information about the state of the system.

The universe (assuming unitary QM) is reversible. In fact from the standpoint of QM there is no arrow of time - it's deterministic, just like Laplace's universe. So, as always, when the word "possibility" is used there has to be some context. To *calculate* a history of the universe from it's present state would require knowing its *complete* present state, including your mental state. Is that "theoretically possible"? I think it involves a paradox of self-reference.

You are almost right. We might be able to know the complete present state, but not the complete history leading that present. You can build a completely self-referential machine capable to describe its entire present state, but not its entire trace. You can go very near that goal, and write a program capable of giving, not its complete trace, but capable of giving a program, which when run, will give the entire trace of the first problem. It is like in arithmetic, we can't define V = arithmetical truth (the set of Gödel numbers of all true sentences), but arithmetical can defined the singleton {V}. With comp, God has no name, but the singleton {God} might have a name. It is counter-intuitive, and I have still some problem to figure out how this is proved, but a proof is available in the Boolos and Jeffrey book.




To put it another way, in the Game of Life, even with perfect information, you can't trace the state of the system backwards because it loses information. So even the laws of physics couldn't work backwards in a universe based on the GOL. QM, I'm informed, doesn't lose information, so (very much in theory) you could work backwards - or (less in theory) the laws of physics could.

Yes the universe doesn't lose information like the GoL. But relative to any point it loses information across spacetime horizons. So there's no way to gather that information up into a calculation unless you have some God's eye view from outside the universe, in which case you could see the past anyway.

OK.



There's a couple of nice papers about this by Yasunori Nomura: arXiv: 1205.267v2 is a popular exposition and arXiv:1205.5550v2 is a more technical paper.

Nomura is very interesting, and is going into the direction that QM belongs to the core physical laws of comp, and that this leads to different "geographical" cosmologies possible. If comp is true, the multiverse = the many-worlds = the many comp dreams. It would entail that "we" are very big numbers, which are very deep. The vast majority of "our computations" below our subst level, would be gievn by our electronic configurations. Our substitution level might be that low.

Bruno




Brent


I wasn't asking whether I could build a chronoscope and watch the past happening on TV.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to