Thanks, Bruno-
 
My point is that yes as Mourjani, nobody who as been revived and claims to have 
had these experiences, comes back, urging more bloodlust, and slaughter. 
Everyone appears emotionally changed by what the feel they experienced, whether 
a hallucination or not.  The God's name thing I comprehend, as when humans try 
to take on the "God" thing as a means of rule and power. I feel with 
Transhumanists, we do so out of desperation, because nobody seems at the 
controls of the good, ship, Universe, most often. The computationalism as a 
post mortem existence/resurrection, cannot yet be falsified ala Karl Popper, 
but a stronger paper in math or physics would certainly go a long way in 
convincing ourselves that it is indeed true and that it is worth doing. Was it 
not Schrodinger who wrote about the "uncanny accuracy of math in describing the 
universe"?  Such of success would go a long way in moving people along 
mentally, attitudinally, in viewing their lives and the lives of others. For 
example, if people become convinced in an intellectual as well as a visceral 
way, that there is a 'later' via the NDE path, or the Hans Moravec path, then 
it makes less sense to be a fanatic, a stick in the mud, or even, a pessimist, 
a cynic. There is suddenly less rational motivation. More coffee, Professor?

Mitch

That is a good point. All people coming back from a NDE talk more about 
"unconditional love". Search for "Anita Mourjani" for eloquent examples. Even 
people doing "bad NDE trip" understand their own responsibility in this, and 
never make any hate speech toward any others.
Some religion professes that we have to fear God, but that is close to non 
sense to me or any (neo)platonists. Of course truth can be feared by the liars.


Now, with classical computationalism, the blaspheme is when you "name God", not 
in a theological inquiry, but when trying to put normative behavior on other 
people. The separation of power is build in the religion, so to speak.
Even if you consider this or that text being from God, you have not the right 
to say that this to somebody else, as that person might not understand (you 
can't know that), and it became an argument per authority, indeed the worst one 
from a believer point of view.








The second possibility I think is worth examination, is the notion that 
fantastic computer processing, if we can call it that, could resurrect the 
dead, or exact copies of the dead, to the point, that from memories, brain 
states, physicality, personal identity, they are, indeed, the same person who 
was deceased. Is this madness, a lie? 


It is an hypothesis, a hope or a fear. It is something which true cannot be 
proven or rationally justified, so it is also a form of theology. It is called 
"computationalism". We cannot know it to be true, if true, but we might refute 
some more precise version of it, like classical comp, which is just comp + the 
classical logical theory of knowledge (S4), which is recovered from Gödel's 
provability notion when you apply to it  the Theaetetus' definitions of 
knowledge (true (justified) opinion).






Possibly, but these two areas are a means to an end, it is, in essence, the How 
questions, of How such is accomplished, not necessarily, the why?



I think comp can explain the how, and a large part of the why (everything 
except the very existence of at least one universal system, that you have with 
the Post-Church-Turing thesis).






 
 Such a development, would for sure, alter the behavior of both Umah and Kufar, 
because the world, in the human mind, and the physical universe would be 
changed, and likely, for the better. We shall see if this is just a bit of 
silliness that will be forgotten, or not?





I am not sure I understand this, but I guess I still need a bit more coffee :)


Bruno



 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, May 29, 2014 4:40 am
Subject: Re: Pluto bounces back!




On 28 May 2014, at 19:21, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:


I am not assuming that it is unethical, but I have pieced together that the 
glorious, afterlife that has  been promised, especially for males, is a sure 
incentive to behave aggressively toward Kufar (infidels). If behaving as such 
pleases the creator, and guarantees a shaheed (martyr) a bevy of interesting 
females to spend one's time with, permanent youth and health, the drinking of 
wine permitted, all this, and more, for the privaledge of pleasing God, dying 
in the fight, and having all this paradise. I congratulate the faithful for 
partaking of this heavenly, vision, for it sounds quite excellent! (Sorry, 
Liz). 
 
 However, it's wrong-headed, just as the Crusades were, in a 'holy' attempt to 
regain 'holy ground' slaughter the the non-Christians, and gain great wealth, 
with the incentive of the son's of the rich could find their fortune and fame 
in pursuit of wealth and Jesus's favor. That was unethical as well, and very, 
murderous, as well. People screw up, because that is the nature of the 
emotional beasts we all are. Thus, misbehavior done in the attempt top gain 
heaven and get one's self rich, is unethical. 
 
 What I am curious about is pushing the envelop for the human condition of 
illness, aging, and death. One area that has gained my attention, the NDE/Sam 
Paria studies, which indicate the possibility of a post Morten survival. 
Interestingly enough. such research has a absolute lack of 'returnee's' saying 
that what they experienced (supposedly) was a demand for war and death. Nobody, 
comes back, and this is worldwide, saying they were told to slay Muslims, 
"cross-worshippers, Hindu's, Al Yahoodi, or even Atheists. This, I find 
interesting. 


That is a good point. All people coming back from a NDE talk more about 
"unconditional love". Search for "Anita Mourjani" for eloquent examples. Even 
people doing "bad NDE trip" understand their own responsibility in this, and 
never make any hate speech toward any others.
Some religion professes that we have to fear God, but that is close to non 
sense to me or any (neo)platonists. Of course truth can be feared by the liars.


Now, with classical computationalism, the blaspheme is when you "name God", not 
in a theological inquiry, but when trying to put normative behavior on other 
people. The separation of power is build in the religion, so to speak.
Even if you consider this or that text being from God, you have not the right 
to say that this to somebody else, as that person might not understand (you 
can't know that), and it became an argument per authority, indeed the worst one 
from a believer point of view.








The second possibility I think is worth examination, is the notion that 
fantastic computer processing, if we can call it that, could resurrect the 
dead, or exact copies of the dead, to the point, that from memories, brain 
states, physicality, personal identity, they are, indeed, the same person who 
was deceased. Is this madness, a lie? 


It is an hypothesis, a hope or a fear. It is something which true cannot be 
proven or rationally justified, so it is also a form of theology. It is called 
"computationalism". We cannot know it to be true, if true, but we might refute 
some more precise version of it, like classical comp, which is just comp + the 
classical logical theory of knowledge (S4), which is recovered from Gödel's 
provability notion when you apply to it  the Theaetetus' definitions of 
knowledge (true (justified) opinion).






Possibly, but these two areas are a means to an end, it is, in essence, the How 
questions, of How such is accomplished, not necessarily, the why?



I think comp can explain the how, and a large part of the why (everything 
except the very existence of at least one universal system, that you have with 
the Post-Church-Turing thesis).






 
 Such a development, would for sure, alter the behavior of both Umah and Kufar, 
because the world, in the human mind, and the physical universe would be 
changed, and likely, for the better. We shall see if this is just a bit of 
silliness that will be forgotten, or not?





I am not sure I understand this, but I guess I still need a bit more coffee :)


Bruno






  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
 From: Samiya Illias <samiyaill...@gmail.com>
 To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
 Sent: Wed, May 28, 2014 12:43 pm
 Subject: Re: Pluto bounces back!
 
 
 
 
You assume that Islam is unethical. Quranic teachings are based on beautiful 
moral principles and enjoin ethical and just relations among people.  The Quran 
repeatedly enjoins good actions, read it and you'll be amazed how far from 
truth all the negative propaganda against it is! 
 
Whether people study and follow the scripture or not is up to them. If we start 
following the guidance, most of the social evils will be weeded out. 
 
  Sadly, you confuse peoples' thoughts, behaviour and actions with the message 
itself. It really doesn't matter if we label ourselves as Muslims, Jews, or any 
other religion or not, or if we are a member of the clergy or hold any 
leadership position in the community, it is basically our beliefs, intentions 
and actions that make us who we are and which we carry with us when we depart 
from this life. 
 

 
 
Samiya 
 

 On 28-May-2014, at 8:52 pm, spudboy100 via Everything List 
<everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
 
 
 
 
For me, its the actual physical, ethics, that need to be tuned up. Getting to 
paradise, however delightful, over someone's dead body is unethical. Morality, 
is between humans and God technically, but ethics is between people. God, as he 
exists, can take care of himself, but the all the humbleness in the world, 
devotion, passion, cannot correct issues, if the Imams, and Muftis, instruct 
otherwise. Even if the Koran, Soonah, and Bukhari are all God given and have 
predictions that only God would know, it does no good if the earth gets drowned 
in blood by seekers of paradise. Unhelpful indeed. 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
 From: LizR <lizj...@gmail.com>
 To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
 Sent: Wed, May 28, 2014 12:32 am
 Subject: Re: Pluto bounces back!
 
 
 
Here's page 1307 - I would prefer it if you quoted whatever it is you're 
referring to rather than giving a link to a (rather difficult to access) online 
book, because it doesn't mean much to me...
 
 
<page1307.png>
 
 ​
 As for the second link, I don't understand what it says there either - it 
certainly isn't a very succinct "summary".
 
 
 

 
 
On 28 May 2014 16:19, Samiya Illias <samiyaill...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
There is a debate between the interpretation of the word s-j-d. I assume it 
also means to become lowly, humble, submissive, and not only physical 
prostration. [http://www.tyndalearchive.com/tabs/lane/ Book 1 Page 1307 ]  
 Summary of why is can't only mean physical prostration: 
http://www.mypercept.co.uk/articles/Summary-problems-sujud-prostration-Quran.html
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:10 AM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
Does it also explain how planets prostrate themselves?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On 28 May 2014 15:51, Samiya Illias <samiyaill...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
I won't be surprised if they eventually discover that there are a total of 11 
or 12 planets in the solar system.  
 [Al-Qur'an 12:4, Translator: Pickthall] When Joseph said unto his father: O my 
father! Lo! I saw in a dream eleven planets and the sun and the moon, I saw 
them prostrating themselves unto me. 
 
[Al-Qur'an 12:100, Translator: Pickthall] And he placed his parents on the dais 
and they fell down before him prostrate, and he said: O my father! This is the 
interpretation of my dream of old. My Lord hath made it true, and He hath shown 
me kindness, since He took me out of the prison and hath brought you from the 
desert after Satan had made strife between me and my brethren. Lo! my Lord is 
tender unto whom He will. He is the Knower, the Wise. 
 

 
 
Samiya 
 
 
http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:35 AM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Pluto Bids To Get Back Planetary Status 
 Pluto has at least five moons, an atmosphere and now a new analysis places its 
diameter as bigger than its outer solar system rival Eris.
 

 
http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/pluto-bids-for-planethood/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
 
 
 
 
 
  
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 
  
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
  
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 


 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to