On Monday, December 1, 2014 2:30:05 AM UTC, yanniru wrote: > > I have read that reference. It is obvious that you have not. > But then almost everything you post here is baloney. > So it may not matter if you read the paper or not. > Richard >
I read and we even exchanged about it. But there are other kinds of correlation showing up on a regular basis now. Such as this: http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/chile-telescope-finds-mysterious-25.html I don't think the data driving wormhole speculation correlates with the data driving the above correlation, for example. So for that reason it isn't a case of wormholes can explain all the correlations. obviously 'wormholes' are not settled science in of themselves, and for that reason they can explain as much as you like. Your likes probably exceed mine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
