Hi,
I've been watching this "if COMP is true then ...." discussion for over 10 
years. In that time my thinking has evolved to the point where I can express 
what COMP now looks like to me, from my perspective.

Comp appears to be trivially true.

 That is, the resultant computing entity would be computing the entire universe 
and hence is simply pointless. It also appears to me that the computing entity 
would not be conscious for the same reason computed flight physics is not 
flight.

There is an endless confusion operating here: The confusing of "the universe as 
computation" with "computing, with this universe, models of how the universe 
appears to us inside it". A deep map/territory confusion. I wrote a book on 
this.

I am not going to spend any further on this because I know COMP is religion 
here and talking to the religious doesn't  work. Witness 10 years and the same 
conversation is still going on. There is a fantastically detailed 
self-promulgating mental cage here in the comp argument. I for one am over it. 
I am building artificial brain and there is no computer involved at all. Comp 
is irrelevant in the real practice of the mission to make real AGI.

When you _don't_ know anything about the universe, yet you are inside it and 
need to survive you need to survive based on fighting  your own ignorance. 

So.... If you already know everything you can compute your way out of 
ignorance... But then you already know everything... So why bother?

You can prove this argument experimentally. I intend, finally, to do this or at 
least organize this before I drop dead.

Comp..... Imo trivially true and wasting the time of a lot of prodigious brains.

That's where i am at, anyway. Thanks for listening. In another 10 years I'll 
see what it looks like again!

 Carry on. 😉.

Cheers 
Colin


-----Original Message-----
From: "LizR" <lizj...@gmail.com>
Sent: ‎6/‎05/‎2015 10:28 AM
To: "everything-list@googlegroups.com" <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The dovetailer disassembled

On 6 May 2015 at 11:24, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:



It seems to be a continuing problem on this list that "comp" is used for idea 
that parts of ones brain could be replaced with an equivalent digital device 
and preserve ones consciousness.  That's a fairly widely held opinion.  But 
then "comp" is also used to mean although consequences Bruno says follow, 
consequences which are not logical inferences, just a reductio.  The two 
"comp's" are not the same.



That's exactly right. Comp is simply short for the computational hypothesis - 
the idea that a computer programme could be conscious, and that human 
consciousness is at some level emulable by a computer programme. (This includes 
the possibility that the brain is a quantum computer, since a QC can be 
emulated by a classical computer.)


Maybe we should distinguish "comp1" and "comp2" or "comp" and "Comp" (or "comp" 
and "Bruno's comp"...!)


Bruno's claim is that comp2 follows from comp1, hence if one accepts comp1 and 
the ancillary assumptions, and one can't find a logical flaw in the argument 
linking them, one can feel free to conflate the two. (This is what Bruno has 
been known to do...) However it would still be nice to know which one someone 
has in mind. Lots of people are happy with comp1 but still don't find comp2 
convincing, even though they can't spot a flaw in the logic.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to