On Tue, Oct 6, 2015  Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

​> ​
>  two brains can, by chance,
> ​ ​
> be in the same physical state at one instant,


​It doesn't matter if it's because of chance or not, if the two brains are
identical at that instant then they have identical memories at that
instant, and unless their environment is different
​the new memories that will be formed will be identical too.​

​> ​
>  but those two brains might be supporting quite different thought
> processes.


​Well let's see how that would work. You're trying to figure out a problem
in General Relativity and I'm trying to figure out how to clean a parrot
cage but we both get distracted and forget everything we know about
Einstein and parrots including the fact that we were once thinking about
those things and all we know is that now we are both trying to remember the
name of the actor who played the skipper on Gilligan's island. In that case
the 2 thought processes, although originally very different, have merged
and so have John Clark and Bruce Kellett.


> ​> ​
> The consequence is that there is one person per brain -- the same person
> can't be spread over several brains.


​The same person can have several neurons, he can have 100 billion in fact,
so why can't he have more than one other biological part, why can't he have
more than one brain? ​


​  John k Clark​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to