John, a beautiful fairy tale, indeed. First you may tell me what is a Primordial Black Hole? Then tell me the story of Dark Matter at all, not based on differences in our alleged mathematical results (missings?) of the physical view of the world. Then, please explain, why you believe in a Big Bang, the results of some backwards calculation in current time on a basis of our PRESENT view of physics, all LINEARLY counted?
The rest comes out of this. Nucleosynthesis? nice. Time(frame) of it? OK. The "Solar Mass" as a counting unit for the entire - what? - Universe (what I call OUR fraction of the Entirety only, with many many more and different ones, of which we have no knowledge of - we just have no reason to restrict the Entirety to the tiny little fraction of (alleged!) knowledge we THINK we know of (and even THAT in an adjusted way to fit the capabilities of our present mind-level). The rest is unknowable for now. Outside of the fairy tale. But it is good to read self-assured peoples' "know-it-all" fairytales. Gives us confidence in the human ingenuity. Restpectfully John Mikes Ph.D., D.Sc., agnostic ret. scientist (38 patents) orig. profession: macromolecular chem. science and technology. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:07 PM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would give 50% odds that the mystery of Dark Matter has been solved and > it will turn out not to be some new particle but will consist of Primordial > Black Holes. We know from the percentage of the elements Hydrogen, > Deuterium, Helium and Lithium how much regular matter was around one > minute after the Big Bang when nucleosynthesis cooked up these elements, > and there is no room for Dark Matter. So the Black Holes that form the bulk > of the Dark Matter can't have come from the corpses of dead stars made of > regular matter; but maybe Black Holes formed long before nucleosynthesis > occurred when the universe was much less than one minute old and things > were too hot for even protons to exist much less elements. > > Stephen Hawking proposed this explanation for Dark Matter some years ago > but the idea had fallen out of favor because it was largely (but not > entirely) ruled out by the data. We know that to account for all the Dark > Matter the Black Holes can't be larger than 100 solar masses because there > would be more gravitational microlensing than we observe. And we know that > to account for all the Dark Matter the Black Holes can't be smaller than 10 > solar masses because we'd see Black Hole explosions /evaporations (if they > were REALLY small) and the orbits of widely spaced binary stars would be > disrupted, but we don't see any of that. > > There is still a window for Primordial Black Holes being Dark Matter that > the data hasn't excluded and it's between 10 and 100 solar masses, and > during its short engineering run that's just what LIGO discovered. It found > a 29 solar mass Black Hole merging with a 36 solar mass Black Hole in a > fifth of a second producing a 62 solar mass black hole and 3 solar masses > of energy in the form of Gravitational Waves. Everybody was amazed they > found something that good so quickly when the instrument hadn't even > reached its design sensitivity yet, everybody thought it would take years > of observing to detect a thing like that. Maybe they just got > extraordinarily lucky, or maybe Black Holes are far far more common than > had been previously thought. Maybe 85% of all the matter in the universe is > in the form of Primordial Black Holes. > > Primordial Black Holes could solve another mystery too. Astronomers have > found a 12 billion solar mass supermassive Black Hole that existed just 900 > million years after the Big Bang, and they've had a very hard time > explaining how a Black Hole could get that big so quickly from the merger > of much smaller Stellar Black Holes that were produced from dead stars. But > if you had 100 solar mass Black Holes around since day one, and if they > were very very common, in fact if 85% of all matter in the universe was in > that form, then the creation of a 12 billion solar mass Black Hole just 900 > million years later is much easier to explain. > > The two LIGO detectors will get back online in September and with greatly > improved sensitivity and will be joined by a third detector, VIRGO near > Pisa in Italy. So we should know pretty soon if Dark Matter and Black Holes > are the same thing, if they are then the second greatest mystery in physics > will have been solved, but we'll still have the mystery of Dark Energy. > > > John K Clark > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
