>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: "Brent Meeker" <meeke...@verizon.net>
>Data: 03/08/2016 8.49
>A: <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Holiday Exercise
>
>
>
>On 8/2/2016 11:37 PM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
>>
>>
>>       
>> The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more than one 
physical
>> body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that 
consciousness
>> is not localized to a single physical body, that it is non-local, for 
instance.
>> Or, indeed, that physics is not fundamental but derivative on 
consciousness.
>> Bruce
>>
>> This reminds me of Schroedinger. “The doctrine of identity can claim that 
it
>> is clinched by the empirical fact that consciousness is never experienced 
in
>> the plural, only in the singular. Not only has none of us even experienced 
more
>> than one consciousness, but there is no trace of circumstantial evidence of
>> this even happening anywhere in the world” (much more in "What is Life?")
>
>But the question isn't whether the Helsinki man experiences two 
>consciousnesses, it's whether he experiences one consciousness of two 
>locations.  You can already be conscious of two locations via 
>television; it's just that your consciousness of one of the places is 
>very limited because you get only visual perception of it and you can't 
>act on it.
>
>Brent

Yes. I remember that, long time ago, David Finkelstein was also interested in 
"introspective" systems. "There is, to be sure, a genuine problem in the 
phenomenon of quantum measurement, but I will not discuss it here. It concerns 
introspective systems, where subject = object so that the basic conception of a 
single subject observing an ensemble of objects must be modified." -- David 
Finkelstein in "The Physics of Logic" (in "Paradigms and Paradoxes", ed. R. G. 
Colodny, 1971, Un. Pittsburgh, p. 60) . I wrote a short email and he responded. 
"Weizsäcker proposed in conversation that in fact the observer divides into two 
parts on such occasions, and then one observes the other as usual. When the 
observer is outside the system, the measurement is represented by a time-
dependent interaction Hamiltonian. This would not make sense for self-
observation, but one can imagine a self-interaction governed by an internal 
parameter instead of time." I'm writing that because to me consciousness may 
have something to do with "introspective" systems.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to