On 2/28/2018 3:38 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
So what do you find more convincing: An axiomatic proof that God exists,
e.g. St Anslem's or Goedel's. or The mere empirical absence of evidence.
In these proves, God = Totality / Ultimate Reality / The Whole
Shebang. They don't mention commandments, or talking snakes or burning
bushes. I think you are proposing a false equivalence.
No, you are inserting one. St Anselm proves that perfect being/agent
exists. He didn't claim to prove any other mythology. So the question
stands: Who ya gonna believe? the axiomatic proof or your lyin' eyes?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
