On 8/16/2018 3:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Aug 2018, at 21:29, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/15/2018 2:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Aug 2018, at 20:09, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/14/2018 2:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
kicking back of the fact that we have to take account the wave structure
integrally.
If you read words metaphorically then you can make them mean anything.
The whole point is that the quantum wave is not a metaphor. That is what the
two slit experience, done with one particle at a time, illustrates.
Moving to instrumentalism is an option in applied physics. It is non sensical
in metaphysics.
On the contrary, it is a metaphysic.
As a metaphysics it is self-defeating as it leads to solipsism. Metaphysical
instrumentalism denies any non-observable reality, not even the dark side of
the moon.
No. That's strawmanning. "Observable" allows for indirect
observation. Observation is not the same as seeing.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
