On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 at 3:15 am, <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's say Bruno does a single slit experiment, aka diffraction, and just > one trial. For each possible outcome, there will be a world with a copy of > Bruno. If we assume space-time is continuous, we get an uncountable number > of Brunos for just a single trial. More trials, more uncountable Brunos. > But Bruno can imagine doing a double slit experiment instead. More > uncountable Brunos. But Bruno can imagine a triple slit experiment, a > quadruple slit experiment, and so on, each adding uncountable copies of > Bruno for just a single trial. Is this a plausible model of the universe, > all to get rid of collapse, which can just as well be left as an unsolved > problem in QM? AG >
It’s incredible that the universe is so large, or that classical physics is wrong, or that irrational numbers exist, or millions of other facts that might surprise an ape that starts to contemplate the nature of reality. The argument from incredulity alone does not carry much weight. > -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
