On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 7:41:03 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > You can derive Schroedinger's equation (even Dirac’s equation) from > Feynman’s formulation. This should be intuitively obvious if you read > Feynman popular book on the Nature of Light. The waves are there. But yes: > the collapse does not make sense in Feynman’s formulation (or it looks even > more ad hoc and non covariant). That is a reason to disbelieve in the > collapse, but then you get some version of the many-world view (which you > dislike apparently). > > >
With Feynman (path integral, or sum over histories), instead of Many Worlds, you get Multiple Histories. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_histories Spoiler alert: Only one history makes it out alive! Some physicists who can't believe in probabilities (stochasticity) - which they avoid like vampires avoid running water - like Many Worlds. - pt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
