On 6/4/2020 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 2 Jun 2020, at 19:34, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
<everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:



On 6/2/2020 2:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 1 Jun 2020, at 22:43, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
<everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:



On 6/1/2020 2:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Brent suggest that we might recover completeness by restricting N to a finite 
domain. That is correct, because all finite function are computable, but then, 
we have incompleteness directly with respect to the computable functions, even 
limited on finite but arbitrary domain. In fact, that moves makes the computer 
simply vanishing, and it makes Mechanism not even definable or expressible.
That's going to come as a big shock to IBM stockholders.
Why? On the contrary. IBM bets on universal machine
No, they bet only on finite machines, and they will be very surprised to hear 
that they have vanished.
They bet on finite machines … including the universal machine, which I insist 
is a finite machine. That is even the reason why I called it from times to 
times universal number.

I recall that once we get the phi_i,

i = 1 to inf.

which can be defined in elementary arithmetic, we get all the universal 
numbers, that is all u such that there phi_u(x, y) = phi_x(y), and such u can 
be used to define all the recursive enumeration of all digital machines.

The implementation of this fine but universal machines are called (physical) 
computer, and is the domain of expertise of IBM.

Bruno



Brent

and know well what is a computer: a finite arithmetical being in touch with the 
infinite, and indeed, always asking for more memory, which is the typical 
symptom of liberty/universality. IBM might be finitist, like Mechanism, but is 
not ultrafinist at all. Anyway, mathematically, Mechanism is consistent with 
ulrafinitsim, even if to prove this, you need to go beyond finitism, (but then 
that’s the case for all consistent theory: none can prove its own consistency 
once “rich enough” (= just Turing universal, not “Löbian”).

Bruno

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3068f558-7f61-56cb-61fe-44832ec28a91%40verizon.net.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/87582a17-b101-aa86-0c27-cf21a663c828%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to