On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 9:57:22 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 6/11/2020 8:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > *Alternatively, you might approach this issue by discussing the alleged > violation of energy conservation by showing the interpretive flaw in the > time-energy form of the UP. Recently, I posed this issue to Brent, several > times; precisely, what this means since time isn't a quantum operator. What > does the "variance of time" mean in this context? But I never received a > reply, from anyone. AG * > > > I thought I did reply to this by pointing to Asher Peres book "Quantum > Theory, Concepts and Methods". It's available free online > > > https://www.academia.edu/35687651/Peres_-_Quantum_Theory_Concepts_and_Methods.pdf > > and has a good chapter discussing the problem of time. The time-energy UP > applies to energy and* time as measured by a physical clock*, not by "t" > in the equation. > > Brent >
Actually, I've downloaded it in the past, and will check out your reference. However, off the top of my head, I don't see the distinction between a physical clock and the "t" in the equation. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f7e160d6-0ca2-46e6-8fbc-d4f9d07bea41o%40googlegroups.com.
