[Philip Benjamin] This an example of the fallacy of irrelevance, an irrelevant conclusion ( ignoratio elenchi is Latin for ''ignoring refutation'' or missing the point). It is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument (that may or may not be logically valid and sound), where the conclusion fails to address the issue in question. What the biospherical 'light matter' is to astrophysical light matter is what Bio dark-matter is to astrophysical dark-matter. Where matter exists, chemistry exists. The source of biophotons is still not clearly settled. The weak interactions between 'light' and 'dark' chemical bonds (spin governed particle configurations) could very well be the source. Philip Benjamin From: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 1:55 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Falling Outward (was: Words, definitions, and Many "Worlds")
It's not "taboo". It's non-existent because we don't know what dark-matter is. It's like saying the genetics of Big Foot are taboo because we're not studying them. There are an infinite number to "possibilities" that are not being studies for the simple reason that nobody thinks they're worth the time to study. So dark-matter chemistry is a wide open field, Phil. Go for it. Brent On 2/18/2021 7:50 AM, Philip Benjamin wrote: Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry is indeed taboo today. Because it implies the possibility of "light" and "dark" twin bodies co-created at the moment of conception. That almost sounds like existence of "spirit' or "soul". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/DM6PR11MB46914A24F2CC3546A4E86C62A8849%40DM6PR11MB4691.namprd11.prod.outlook.com.
