Two recent  papers, both from China that came out within a day of each
other, say China now has a machine that has won the title of world's
fastest Quantum Computer from Google.

Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum
processor <https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14734>

Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light
<https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15534>

In 2019 Google claimed their 54 Qubit Quantum Computer could solve a type
of problem, called "Boson Sampling", in 3 minutes and 20 seconds that
would've taken IBM's largest supercomputer 10,000 years to solve, but a few
weeks later IBM disputed that claim by saying it had developed an
enormously improved conventional Boson Sampling algorithm that would allow
their big conventional computer to solve it and only 2 1/2 days; not as
impressive as 10,000 years but 2 1/2 days is still a lot longer than 3
minutes and 20 seconds. And now the two Chinese papers say their computer
solved a different Boson Sampling problem in 70 minutes with their 56
Qubit Quantum
Computer (2 more Qubits can make a big difference) that was much more
difficult than the one Google solved, and even with IBM's improved
algorithm it would still take their conventional supercomputer at least 8
years to do what their new Quantum Computer did in 70  minutes. Actually
the Chinese machine is a 66 Qubit machine, but they only used 56 of them
for this test.

Solving  Boson Sampling problems doesn't have much practical use except to
prove that a real nuts and bolts Quantum Computer, and not just a paper and
ink machine, can solve problems that conventional computers cannot. I can't
see any theoretical reason why in the near future they won't start solving
practical problems too.

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
t900

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2pvE5o9F9phnSCX%2Bf48iysxSv2qp%2BMMmsViywKOov0QQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to