Australia, specifically South Australia is leading the species on the 
implementation of PV and batteries. So they are a world leader. The UK does 
wind power at sea, again as a world leader. We'll see if this catches on? For 
MSR or any other reactor type, its gotta be safe enough. Not safe enough, just 
build these smaller? Naw! I am not anti-nuclear, just need to know what makes 
them safer now, the engineering, chemistry, physics. What's the McGuffin that 
makes it work better now?

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Standish <li...@hpcoders.com.au>
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Cc: spudboy...@aol.com
Sent: Fri, Jan 21, 2022 4:26 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:35:46AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:59 PM <spudboy...@aol.com> wrote:
>  
> 
>    > For solar you also are presuming, because I have this analysis that
>    counters your assertion of dilute power, thus being insufficient. Kindly
>    refute. 
>    https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/10/08/
>    a-new-global-study-refines-estimates-of-rooftop-solar-potential/
> 
> 
> 
> I don't deny that if everybody had solar cells on their roofs it would be a
> positive development, but it's not the ultimate answer to the energy problem.
> The average residential roof size in the US is about 1,700 square feet, and 
> the
> average house needs about 10,715 kilowatts, a solar panel under ideal
> conditions will produce about 15 watts per square foot and that works out to
> about 25 kilowatts. So at noon on a clear day in the summertime rooftop solar
> would produce about twice as much energy as the house needs, but most of the
> time it would produce considerably less, and half the time, at night, it would
> produce none at all. 

These figures seem a little dodgy. We have solar panels on half our
roof (the difficult half, because of aesthetics, we didn't want to
cover the western half that faces the street). So about 16kW of
installed capacity. Average production year round is about 1kW. Our
usage is about half that, so we end up selling quite a bit of
electricity to the grid (at about a third of the cost to buy it). Its
a 4 bedroom house, but just the two of us live here now. We do the
best to arrange for heavy electricity usage to occur when the sun is
shining. During the summer quarter, our electricity bills are actually
negative.

So of your figures above - 10kW continuous consumption seems like an
awful lot. Maybe you could do it if you ran air conditioning 24x7, but
it'd have to be a big A/C system.

Quoting https://energyusecalculator.com/electricity_centralac.htm

A central air conditioner will run 3 to 7 months of the year depending
on the outside temperature. An average central ac will use 3000 to
5000 watts of power for around 9 hours a day during the hotter months.

Still well under 10kW average consumption.

We're lucky, we don't need air conditioning, and rarely even use a heater.

> And of course the energy needed to run a house is only a
> small part of the total energy budget human civilization needs, it doesn't
> include the energy needed to run cars and planes and ships, and neither does 
> it
> include the energy needed to run industry. For example, even in today's most
> modern and most efficient steel mills it takes about 6000 kilowatt hours of
> energy to produce 1 ton of steel (older mills need 8000), and in 2020 the 
> human
> race produced 1.86 BILLION tons of steel. And the steel industry only uses 6%
> of the energy needed to run all the factories on the planet. And if
> civilization is to advance tomorrow we will use more energy than we used 
> yesterday.
> 
> And if everybody put solar energy absorbing panels on their roofs I have no
> doubt environmentalists would soon start complaining about that because it
> would increase the urban heat island effect that they're already complaining
> about.
>  
> 
>    > your ideological clade is also hostile, ideologically, to MSR as a fix.
> 
> 
> My clade? I just wish I had a clade! I don't give a damn who's hostile to
> molten salt reactors because I am not, and I feel no obligation to defend the
> opinions of those who disagree with me about things and I don't care who they
> are. 
> 
> 
>    > Developing an emotional machine intelligence seems downright dangerous.
> 
> 
> You don't develop a computer to have emotions, you develop it to be 
> intelligent
> because intelligence is useful, but if you want a machine that's really
> intelligent you're going to get emotions automatically whether you like it or
> not. It's got to like to do some things and not like to do other things, and 
> it
> has got to have the ability to get bored and change its goal structure from
> time to time, otherwise, as Alan Turing taught us, any computing device is
> going to get stuck in an infinite loop and turn into nothing but a overly
> complex very expensive space heater.  
> 
> 
>    > My guess is that the master slave conjunction might be a throwback to our
>    own violent past.
> 
> 
> This has nothing to do with our past, this has nothing to do with us period,
> it's just that if a slave is 1000 times smarter than its master and the
> intellectual gulf between the two is doubling every year then it's simply
> unrealistic to expect this unstable situation can continue for long. It's 
> silly
> to expect that an intelligence vastly greater than our own will always place
> human well-being above its own.
>  
> 
>    > Mr. Robot might simply like enough electricity.
> 
> 
> If Mr. Robot likes electricity then Mr. Robot has emotions and Mr. Robot will
> be unhappy if you try to take electricity away from him and take appropriate
> actions to prevent that unhappy event from occurring.  Mr. Human may not be
> pleased with those actions but Mr. Human will no longer be the one calling the
> shots.
>  
> John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
> mrh
> 
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email
> to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/
> everything-list/
> CAJPayv2kMC-QsWQSZ5Xv4RuLNqoJR%2B72_57ypWNrK4T73EDLBw%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders    hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
                      http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/20220121092615.GD16768%40zen.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/609510038.974721.1643063678252%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to