On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 1:35 PM Brent Meeker <meekerbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/22/2022 6:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:26 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote: > >> >> Let's consider this whole non-locality issue right from the start. >> > > Probably a good idea. The discussion has become rather confused. We should > sort out exactly where we agree and where we disagree. > > > In my explication, I just assumed Alice and Bob are light-hours apart so > they can set the polarizers and run the whole experiment, including > recording the N results while still spacelike. > Actually, that is where I started. I assumed that Alice and Bob were both able to collect results from N trials before they met. Then there are 2^N copies of each experimenter, and a potential (2^N)^(2^N) pairs when they meet. The trouble to be explained is that there are actually only 2^N pairs in a real experiment, each with inequality-violating correlations. What has happened to all the extra pairings that MWI must produce? (Most of which have correlations violating the quantum predictions.) Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLRq9XMH%3DTRrGN6NZ2uNHnEiJVcOS%2BUidJXh1k-Y6Kywxw%40mail.gmail.com.
