This quote is from today's issue of the New York Times, it's about a
company called BlueWave that has found a way to use the same land for both
farming and solar cell electrical production, and environmentalists oppose
the idea of course:

"*chapters of the Audubon nonprofit environmental organization have been
vocal about the technology’s potential effect on wildlife. Michelle Manion,
the vice president of policy and advocacy for Mass Audubon (which is not
affiliated with the National Audubon Society), said that while her
organization supported renewable energy, including solar within farming
operations, “we want to maximize the placement of ground-mounted solar on
some of our lands that are the least ecologically sensitive first.” And
there are general concerns that even with dual-use solar panels, arable
land may be lost, though BlueWave says that the land can be reverted to
pure agriculture uses once the solar leases — typically 20 to 30 years —
expire*."

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>

961

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0uhAEghZS1RT0KpoKNvFCLaohAkyht6Br2bkrLwWpWag%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to