On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:32 AM John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:22 PM Jesse Mazer <laserma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > *> Depends what you mean by "couldn't be true"--my understanding is that >> Einstein's EPR paper was just asserting that there must be additional >> elements of reality beyond the quantum description* >> > > Yes, Einstein thought he had proven that quantum mechanics* must *be > incomplete because nature just couldn't be that ridiculous. But it turned > out nature *could* be that ridiculous. The moral of the story is that > being ridiculous is not necessarily the same thing as being wrong. > Nevertheless, being ridiculous is no indication that an idea is correct. Evidence matters, and there is no evidence that the multiverse of Everett has anything to do with cosmology. In fact, there is no direct evidence that the quantum multiverse even exists. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSupnu%3D1MQ0dwfXiYggtRXiR%3Dvxs349t89j%2Bm%2BqKHK_%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
