On Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 11:49:04 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 11:03:52 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote: It means that a system in a superposition is in one of the states defining the superposition, but we don't know which one. Brent alleged it is "exactly wrong". I'd like an argument why that's the case, if it is. Does it follow from Bell experiments? TY, AG Aside from the Ignorance Interpretation, there are two others; namely, that the system is *simultaneously *in* all *states of the superposition, and that the system is in* none* of the states of the superposition. At present, I tend to believe* the *latter, and that a superposition is a mathematical construct the founders stumbled upon, which allows us to calculate probabilities, but has no additional meaning. AG ITSM that the Ignorance Interpretations is, de facto, a realist interpretation, which I think Bell experiments falsified. Is this correct? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a04d120e-cb19-4248-a361-42358fd3869en%40googlegroups.com.
