On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 11:30 PM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > *I would say that the best definition of "physical" that I know of is that > something is physical if and only if it is capable, at least in theory, of > encoding information.* > Sounds a bit tautological to me: Something is "physical" if it is capable of encoding information physically. It does not follow that information is physical. There is probably an infinite amount of information around that is not encoded, physically or in any other way: the number of ants in my backyard; the number of bees in that swarm; the average BMI of my friends; etc; etc. Bruce. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQhHCxtDKWvSTzMWVC7Keycg1fYYbpH-v_hDWkn%2BO7rLQ%40mail.gmail.com.
