On Friday, November 15, 2024 at 7:38:06 PM UTC-7 Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:02:14AM -0800, Alan Grayson wrote: > As I see it, JC's core claim about the MWI is that it follows from S's > equation It comes about by not making any further assumptions, like the wavefunction collapse of CI, or pilot waves of Bohmian mechanics which privilege one branch over the others. *Do you have any concept what a WHOLE universe is? (I didn't think so.) And * *you're assuming they're metastasizing but you can never detect any of them! * *And this, presumably, is what you call rigorous thinking? Which university * *awarded you a Ph'D? AG* > ; namely, that anything the can happen (has a non-zero probability), > must happen (in some world). I fail to see anything in S's equation to support > this claim. And, I fail to see JC argue for this claim. Thus, IMO, I've put the > nail in the coffin to the MWI. AG > You think! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9f10b98c-faa4-4c24-8e5b-19b775fa3a62n%40googlegroups.com.
