On 12/6/2024 7:47 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Friday, December 6, 2024 at 8:00:56 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




    On 12/6/2024 6:09 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Friday, December 6, 2024 at 5:30:59 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:

        I thought I had put this to bed long ago. Here's how is looks
        in the cars reference frame. The garage ,which is 10' long,
        is moving fast toward the car.  It's length is Lorentz
        contracted to only 6', so the car doesn't fit.  No surprise
        since the car is 12' long.



        But now from the garage's reference frame.  The car is
        contracted to only 8' and so fits nicely, both ends of the
        car are inside the garage at the same time (where
        simultaneity is defined in the garage reference frame).


        But doesn't this contradict the car's observation that the
        garage was way to short?  No, because what the car measure to
        be simultaneous is shown as the slanted car.  His front
        bumper was well beyond the end of the garage when his rear
        bumper had just entered.  These two diagrams are just the
        Lorentz transform of one another.


    *Please elaborate on this point. TY, AG*


        Brent


    *So, from the car's frame, the car won't fit in garage due to
    contraction of garage's length, but from garage frame the car
    fits perfectly due to contraction of car's length, and then it
    doesn't? *
    How did you get "and then it doesn't out of what I wrote."  Study
    the diagram.

    Brent


*First the car doesn't fit from car's frame, then it does fit from garage frame, then the elogated car doesn't fit from garage frame. AG*

*Maybe you don't know the difference between a space/time diagram and a space/space diagram.

Brent
*


    *So, apparently, there's no objective answer to the question of
    whether car fits in garage, or not. Doesn't there have to be
    agreement betweem the frames to claim the apparent paradox is
    resolved? BTW, what velcoity did you use to get the numerical
    contraction values? AG*

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/544287f4-79dc-47ed-ab38-d78b379e2e9fn%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/544287f4-79dc-47ed-ab38-d78b379e2e9fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fd030133-9ea0-4818-9937-3585ba9c4298%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to