On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 5:11 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > *> the length of the car can be assumed as small as necessary* > > > *Yes.* > > *> which leads to a paradox* > > > *Please specify the paradox that you think you see. * > > *> You already identified it, in effect,* > *Nope, read what I said again * > * > that if the frames disagree whether the car fits, relativity is > falsified.* > *Relatively would only be falsified if they agreed that "the following 2 events occurred SIMULTANEOUSLY" but disagreed about the car fitting; and that's not what happened. They agree there was a time when the front of the car was in the garage and they agreed there was a time when the back of the car was in the garage and they agreed that there was a time when both doors on the garage were closed, but they disagreed about those events happening simultaneously. The result is odd but not paradoxical. * *John K Clark* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0Bd6QbZtpHcpAmE-S%2BdKQrJo9Tg0zB9NcEJDYtijQ5_g%40mail.gmail.com.

