Your whole life is useless. Also, the fact that you are not aware of the woke DEI hiring practices in which people are hired based on skin color and the person they have sex with instead of merit, shows that you are totally oblivious of the communism already present in your country. Luckily Trump got elected so let's hope he will terminate this communist hiring practices.
On Friday, 6 December 2024 at 13:41:09 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, December 5, 2024 at 7:55:25 AM UTC-7 Cosmin Visan wrote: > > Telepathy is consciousnesses unification. > > > *Does this mean local or non-local? In any event, this is the type of > comment that is operationally useless. If we want to unify QM and GR, we > have to decide if the new theory is local or non-local, since it can't be > both AFAIK. Further, will the new theory be deterministic or probabilistic? > And if probabilistic, meaning quantum, what observable or whatever, will be > quantified? So, I hope you can see how useless your comments are, even if > they are ultimately correct in the way the universe is structured. AG* > > *And while I'm here, I'd like to point out that your comments about > Communism being a threat to America illustrates how misinformed your > CONSCIOUSNESS is. It's like you have no clue whatsoever what Communism is! > It's about transitioning from a private enterprise-based economy, to an > economy based on state controlled planning in the total absence of > democracy. At present, no American politician advocates the latter, either > explicitly or implicitly. What you're apparently worried about is a > non-existent figment of your over-active imagination. Good day. AG * > > > On Thursday, 5 December 2024 at 06:32:16 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 3, 2024 at 4:11:32 PM UTC-7 Cosmin Visan wrote: > > That's for the trivial reason that consciousness is all there is. And of > course consciousness is non-local since you have telepathies, > precognitions, etc. > > > I'm pretty sure that consciousness is LOCAL. In my experiences with > telephathy, it seems that minds are co-located, which define LOCAL. AG > > > On Monday, 2 December 2024 at 00:23:57 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote: > > I'm referring to the effort to unify GR with QM. The more it seems likely > that QM is non-local, the less it seems possible to unify it with GR, a > local theory. Is my pessimism ill-founded? AG > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7a91b6df-6df7-4abd-9f2b-8d149bcfaac6n%40googlegroups.com.
